Monday, June 5, 2017

Section 79 Lawsuits,412i, 419e plans litigation and IRS Audit Experts for abusive insurance based plans | Lance Wallach | LinkedIn

Section 79 Lawsuits,412i, 419e plans litigation and IRS Audit Experts for abusive insurance based plans | Lance Wallach | LinkedIn

4 comments:


  1. CJA and Associates got me audited


    2 of 5 CJA And Associates Reviews
    Jan 15, 2015 171 views 3 comments
    They issued a plan that I believed was a good deal and would provide adequate coverage for my employees and save me money on taxes.However it did not, I ended up getting audited by the IRS and having my employees sue me.

    There is a class action suit being taken against these crooks for their captive insurance plan and as many people as possible should join in and put them out of business.

    Luckily I reached out to Lance Wallach for help and was able to avoid bankruptcy.Visit http://cja.tax/ to learn more about how to get out from under the tragedy that CJA and associates heaped upon you.

    ReplyDelete

  2. CJA and Associates got me audited


    2 of 5 CJA And Associates Reviews
    Jan 15, 2015 171 views 3 comments
    They issued a plan that I believed was a good deal and would provide adequate coverage for my employees and save me money on taxes.However it did not, I ended up getting audited by the IRS and having my employees sue me.

    There is a class action suit being taken against these crooks for their captive insurance plan and as many people as possible should join in and put them out of business.

    Luckily I reached out to Lance Wallach for help and was able to avoid bankruptcy.Visit http://cja.tax/ to learn more about how to get out from under the tragedy that CJA and associates heaped upon you.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Plaintiffs allege that between 2004 and the end of 2013, John Koresko and affiliated individuals in the course of operating multiple-employer welfare arrangements known as REAL VEBA and SEWBP, converted and misused assets of the trusts in an amount in excess of $35 million, as set forth more fully in the Perez Action. The Court, however, entered judgment against the Koresko defendants in the Perez Action in the amount of approximately $19 million, the shortfall in trust assets as found by the Court. Plaintiffs allege that the Defendants are either co-fiduciaries who failed to take appropriate steps to prevent the conversions, co-fiduciaries or parties-in-interest who improperly benefited from transactions involving the trusts, recipients of the improperly spent funds, or parties who otherwise knowingly participated in such breaches. As to F&M Trust, Plaintiffs allege that the F&M Trust failed to perform its fiduciary duties in accordance with the prudent man standard of care, knowingly participated in and facilitated misconduct by its co-fiduciaries, and failed to take reasonable steps to prevent or remedy any fiduciary breaches of co-fiduciaries. Plaintiffs purport to state claims against F&M Trust under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and common law.

    ReplyDelete